Showing posts with label Blue Wall Of Silence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blue Wall Of Silence. Show all posts

Sunday, July 17, 2016

Blue Lives Have Never NOT Mattered.

First things first.

Being a police officer is a dangerous, and often thankless job.  They are charged with running towards the danger, while everyone else runs away.  Good police officers put their lives on the line whenever they're on the street, and in many cases, a traffic stop can lead to horrific results.

But recently, especially in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement and people demanding accountability for bad (emphasis on BAD, I can't emphasize "BAD" enough) cops, police officers and their defenders have responded with Blue Lives Matter.  This counter-movement gives the appearance that law enforcement officials en masse are under attack, and that their lives don't matter, and that they are being victimized by Black Lives Matter activists and other ne'er do wells.

But here is the truth of the matter.  Even if we look beyond the face value of what "Blue Lives Matter" means (a career choice as opposed to a skin color), "Blue Lives" have ALWAYS mattered.  Yes, police are held to a higher standard, and one of their own is taken out, it is indeed a tragedy.  No one (reasonable) is saying that it was a good thing that this happened.  The best way to prove that Blue Lives have always mattered, look at the response when even a single police officer is shot or otherwise killed.

When a police officer gets shot, here's what's NOT going to happen:

* Media outlets diving into the officer's history, to see if his background justified him getting shot.
* Law enforcement officials protecting the identity of the shooter.
* A community circling the wagons around the shooter.
* A prosecution team that will poison the well so that an indictment won't be handed down.
* People almost everywhere blaming the cop for his getting shot.
* An investigation that moves at a snail's pace.
* Alternately, a quickie investigation that only serves to fit a pre-prepared narrative.
* A look into what really happened ONLY after compelling, air tight video of the shooting is released.
* The shooting victim's treatment as "oh well, stuff happens."
* Video footage of the shooting victim's demise, dominating the news cycle and being aired repeatedly.
* Picture after picture of the police officer's bloodied and bullet-ridden body flooding social media.

You see, when a police officer is killed, people will pursue the shooter to the very gates of Hell until the officer's family sees justice.  Blue Lives have always mattered.

Wait.  Scratch that.  There is ONE exception to the rule that Blue Lives have always mattered.  And that exception?

When police retaliate against one of their own for daring to cross the Thin Blue Line, then, suddenly, Blue Lives don't matter as much.  It was demonstrated in the case of NYPD detective Frank Serpico, who became a whisteblower against corruption in the New York Police Department.  Side note, I should check out the movie based on his life.

Then there's this (and this is only the tip of the iceberg):



All of these law enforcement officials were trying to do the right thing, and they faced retaliation from their peers and superiors.  Recently, police officers have been shot, and the narrative (of course) is that these shootings are the result of Black Lives Matter activists.  Rushes to judgment are made, suspects are incorrectly identified, and mayhem ensues.  The fact of the matter is that there is a chasm of mistrust between law enforcement and the people that they have been sworn to protect.  We have heard talk about training police officers, and saw videos about how to respond when pulled over by the police, but very few people are addressing one key component.

If you want to rebuild trust between the police and the community, you MUST tear down the Blue Wall of Silence and allow the good police officers to cross the Thin Blue Line to weed out the worst in their ranks.  They should be able to do so without fear of retaliation from their peers or superiors.  A good cop shouldn't have to worry about a call for backup or assistance suddenly going unanswered, or "delayed."

"But Ty", I hear you saying, because frankly, you ask too many questions, "...police overall are good, and the good ones shouldn't be lumped in with the bad ones."

And that is true.  And unfortunately, it's a luxury that isn't extended to groups like "Black Lives Matter."  Whenever someone in a Black Lives Matter rally/march/protest says or does something stupid, the entire movement is blamed.  The entire cause is denigrated because of the actions of some outliers, who may be more interested in being opportunistic slugs than being agents of change.

Imagine if that logic were extended to the Men and Women in Blue:
  • Under the power and authority of his badge, Daniel Holtzclaw raped women he knew couldn't fight back.
  • Under the power and authority of his badge, Joe Gliniewicz stole from youth police organizations and planned to murder those investigating him.
  • Under the power and authority of his badge, Jason Van Dyke emptied his weapon into the body of Laquan McDonald, and lied about the encounter.
  • Under the power and authority of his badge, Jon Burge led a campaign of systematic torture that led to scores of individuals confessing to crimes they did not commit.
  • Police officer Anthony Abbate tried to hide behind the Blue Wall of Silence, which attempted to protect him, after he savagely and brutally attacked a female bartender.
  • And then there's this:


WHY DOES SHE STILL HAVE A JOB?!

Do any of these law enforcement abominations prevent anyone from supporting something like "Blue Lives Matter"?

If not, then why let outliers within the Black Lives Matter movement shape your perspective of the movement and its purpose as a whole?  Privilege doesn't allow for the "lone wolf" scenario to be extended to anyone who isn't white, male, and Christian.

Blue Lives have always mattered, and it does a grave injustice to everyone involved to pretend that it doesn't especially when this rallying cry is used to undermine legitimate aims to call for accountability and equal protection under the law in regards to police officers.  We need everyone, from the President of the United States on down, to demand that police officers who violate the public trust are immediately fired and prosecuted.  And when they are sued, put their pensions and salaries on the line.  Let them put some financial skin in the game, and watch complaints plummet.

Encourage police officers to cross the Thin Blue Line.  Smash the Blue Wall of Silence.  Stop rushing to judgment and accepting the "official" police narrative until the investigations are complete.  Hold the bad officers accountable immediately.

These are several ways to rebuild the broken trust that exists between police and citizens.  And these things must be done YESTERDAY.

Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Boss Rahm Must Go! (...but not so fast...)



Behold Boss Rahm.  The Rahm-Father.  Chicago's mayor, the Honorable Rahm Emanuel.  He managed to squeak into his second term as mayor in 2014, after defeating candidate Jesus "Chuy" Garcia in a run-off election.  For what it's worth, the restructuring of the mayoral race was designed to prevent such a thing from happening.  Chicago's mayors are selected by popular vote, in a non-partisan race.  If no candidate has 50% of the vote, then a run-off election decides the winner.  He was elected in 2011, with his primary positives being not Pharaoh Richard Daley and the former Chief of Staff for President Obama.

But enough history.

Right now, Boss Rahm is very vulnerable.  The shooting death of Laquan McDonald has revealed some horrifying information about the city of Chicago, the Chicago Police Department, and the stink goes all the way up to the 5th Floor of City Hall.  Long story short, Laquan was shot by the police.  The police spun a narrative saying that Laquan, while high on PCP, lunged at the police, forcing Officer Jason Van Dyke to open fire, shooting Laquan twice in the chest and killing him.  That was the prevailing narrative for over a year, and the narrative was carried through in press releases and comments from the head of the local chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police.  But for a whistle-blower, some actual investigative journalists, the Freedom of Information Act, and a judge's court order, that would STILL be the prevailing narrative.

But thanks to these efforts, the truth came out.  The horrific video (which is available everywhere on the 'net) shows Laquan walking AWAY from the cops, with Van Dyke then opening fire twice.  And after Laquan's body hits the ground, Van Dyke empties his clip, shooting Laquan 14 more times.  14 more bullets enter into a dead teenager's body.  The video was so damning and so revealing that the city settled with the family for $5 million, even before the family had a chance to file a civil or wrongful-death suit.  And guess who fought to keep the video from being released?

You guessed it, Boss Rahm.

After the video was released, the city has seen protest after protest.  They were peaceful protests, and as a side note, I will never buy the Chicago Sun-Times for their coverage of the Black Friday protests.

Pictured:  Irresponsible journalism and something to line your cat's litter box.
Cook County District Attorney Anita Alvarez actually charged Officer Van Dyke with murder, but her record with prosecuting police and being on the side of the people isn't exactly stellar.  She is vulnerable, as well, as her former allies are turning on her and abandoning her.  But this isn't about her for now, although she has her own metric ton of questions that need to be answered.

Since the video has been released, lots of people are taking the hit.  Garry McCarthy was the first major figure to take a hit.  After meeting with the media, Garry assured himself that everything was fine.

McCarthy:  Rahm, did you hear that? Sounds like a bus...
Rahm:  No, didn't here a thing... now if you can just stand over THERE...
** THUMPITY THUMP THUMP **

That was the sound of Boss Rahm throwing McCarthy under the bus.  But that was just the first in several dominoes to fall.  U.S. Attorney General has announced that the U.S. Justice Department will investigate the Chicago Police Department in the wake of the Laquan McDonald shooting.  And the aftermath has caused other rats to leave the sinking ship.  Among them are Chicago Police Chief of Detectives Constantine "Dean" Andrews, and Scott Ando, the head of the Independent Police Review Authority.  The latter is especially interesting, since the purpose of the Independent Police Review Authority was to independently investigate bad cops.  But the Blue Wall of Silence was so pervasive that one of its investigators was fired because he wouldn't cook the books to make police look good.

Which brings us back to the very vulnerable Boss Rahm.  He is trying to salvage his career by creating a "Task Force" to "strengthen the fabric of trust between the Chicago Police Department and the communities it protects.  But that is doing little to reduce the calls for Boss Rahm to be tossed from office.  There was a huge protest today (12/9) that spilled into the James R. Thompson Center, because City Hall was locked down.  The calls for Boss Rahm to step down are coming from all corners of the city.  But I think that Boss Rahm should not be given the luxury of resigning from office.  Voters have notoriously short memories, and if Boss Rahm is allowed to walk away, the outrage that is felt now will have dissipated by the time the next mayoral election rolls around.

In the wake of these shootings, investigations, and whatever else the Justice Department uncovers, Boss Rahm should stay in office.  He should stay in office and answer all of the questions he has to face.  He should have to answer questions about what he knew about the Laquan McDonald shooting, and when he knew it.  He should answer questions about why, under his watch, an Independent Police Review Authority inspector was fired for doing exactly what his job called for him to do.  Every remaining moment of Boss Rahm's mayoral career should be moments holding him accountable for everything that happened under his watch.  Every Chicago tax payer's dollar that was used to settle cases involving terrible police officers.  Every officer in the McDonald shooting that signed off on the original, false narrative that remains on the job.  Every school privatization horror story involving terrible food.  Every dollar of funds used in Barbara Byrd-Bennett's schemes (and what did he know about HER, and when did he know THAT)?

Edited to add:

In my haste, I forgot about a particular incident where Boss Rahm went into full Corleone mode.  He basically said to youth leaders, Black clergy, and members of the City Council Black Caucus that "it would be a shame if there were no jobs funneled into your community because of these protests."  THAT was Boss Rahm being the same man who sent his opposition a dead fish wrapped in a newspaper.

If we have the political and intestinal fortitude, Boss Rahm can either be forced out of office in disgrace or (my preferred choice) dragged into the next mayoral race as a lame duck, which would be a first for Chicago.  And up until that moment, the voters can actually put action behind the protests and show up at the polls in unprecedented amounts.  Boss Rahm can receive the public condemnation and repudiation from the public that he so richly deserves as he is unceremoniously cast from office.  

As for his replacement and the next mayor of Chicago?  I have an idea.

The Honorable Dr. Amara Enyia, Mayor Of Chicago
...I can dream, can't I?